Is it Time for Minutemen Again?

I look at the daily reports on the news of the “invasion” of our country by illegals and it frustrates me. The Trump administration wants to stop it but the other side wants it to continue.

The administration is unwilling to take that step which will stop it. Unfortunately. as long as there is little risk and no consequences for crossing the border, the illegals will continue to do so. Hypothetically, if a warning spray of bullets hit under the feet of the people sitting on top of those fences, what do you think would happen? Obviously, the violators would scramble back to their side as fast as possible. How many would risk a second climb? Signs need to be put up warning illegals of fatal consequences if they attempt to cross.

What if they do cross? Well, a warning not kept is an invitation. Who will do this? The military is held helpless by politics and, this cannot go on. If a person can defend their home from invaders, does it not flow that, a country can be defended by its citizens? Perhaps it is time that the citizens of this country defended their home by converging on the southern border and stop the invasion. In that scenario, no one gets in. No one foot in makes you safe. everyone is turned back. Violent invaders are shown the error of their ways. At the river, boats are turned back with force as necessary.

I will bet you that, the same law enforcement and military who are helpless to stop the invasion soon show up to stop the defense of the country by its citizens. By constantly moving from place to place, the citizens would remain effective and the government ineffective. Guerrilla defense?

The Minutemen defended this country once. I submit that it may be time to lose patience with politics and do what is necessary. It is time to go on the offense so that, there is an effective defense.

I invite your thoughts.

Two Arkansas Men Arrested for Shooting Each Other While Wearing Bulletproof Vests [Video]

ROGERS, Ark. (KFSM) — Two Rogers men reportedly shot each other during a night of drinking while each man tried on a bulletproof vest.

5NewsOnline – Charles Eugene Ferris, 50, and Christopher Hicks, 36, were both arrested Sunday (March 31) in connection with aggravated assault — a Class D felony.

A Benton County sheriff’s deputy took the initial report from Ferris at the hospital, where Ferris invented a lively story to cover for Hicks.

Ferris said he was hired to protect an “asset,” who paid him $200 to follow him into the woods at Hobbs State Park, according to a probable cause affidavit.

Ferris said the pair went out into the woods and met another man around 10 p.m. The man approached Ferris’ “asset” when a gunfight broke out. Ferris said he was struck six times, but also managed to return fire before driving off with the “asset,” according to the affidavit.

Ferris said the “asset” dropped him off at his vehicle before he dumped his weapons and drove himself to Mercy Hospital.

However, Ferris’ wife arrived at the hospital a short time later, telling investigators that her husband and Hicks shot each other while drinking on the back porch of their home on Deer Run Lane.

Ferris later recanted his initial story to deputies, saying he made it up to keep Hicks from getting in trouble, according to the affidavit.

Ferris said he had been wearing the vest when he asked Hicks to shoot him with a .22-caliber semi-automatic rifle. The vest stopped the bullet, but still hurt and left a mark on his chest.

Ferris, now “pissed” because he was hurting from the shot, “unloaded the clip into Christopher’s back,” according to the affidavit.

Hicks’ only suffered bruising from the gunshots.

Ferris initially told his wife “he was fine” after the shooting, but complained about the pain, so she told him to go to the hospital, according to the affidavit.

Hicks and Ferris are free on $5,000 bonds. A judge issued a no-contact order between the men.

Both men have hearings set for May 13 in Benton County Circuit Court.

In Arkansas, Class D felonies are punishable by up to six years in prison and a maximum fine of $10,000.

Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership Press Release – Gun Control Is NOT KOSHER

Official JPFO Press Release | For Immediate Release

“Jews for the Confiscation of Firearms Ownership”

JPFO CONDEMNS JEWISH CALLS TO DISARM:

“Of all people, Jews should know better.” –JPFO Position

• To every Jewish pundit seeking more gun law after unarmed New Zealanders murdered

• To every Jewish Congressperson who voted for H.R.8 and H.R.1112

• To every Jewish denomination that proposes “gun-control” by government agents

After outrageous mass murders in New Zealand—and deadly acts of similar sociopaths in recent memory—too many Jews around the world, among other thought leaders, are again screaming bloody murder to disarm innocent people who didn’t do anything. JPFO condemns these dangerous illogical demands in the strongest terms possible. Facing these threats, you should call for the exact opposite, as Brazil is doing (WSJ, 3/16, A10).

Making people defenseless does not make criminals and sociopaths harmless.

It does the exact opposite, empowering evil—and demonstrates irrational thinking from the people who believe they should lead society. Following a mass murder, calls should increase for universal self-defense training, discounts and sales on firearms, range time, ammunition, classes for men, women, children and families as groups, and new gun-safety and marksmanship curricula for schools.

Unfortunately, leading the charge to disarm the public and make people helpless in the face of known dire threats that are clear and present dangers, are Jews for the confiscation of firearms. These misguided brethren of ours have been misled and have forgotten the lesson of the Holocaust: “Never Again!” If they remembered, there would be no way to attack us and get away with it. We would bring a barrage down upon the attackers that would forever give them pause before such an attempt were ever made. Never Again! Wake up and smell the muzzles pointed at you.

# # #

Research conducted by Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, http://www.jpfo.org/ shows that all four main branches of Judaism support gun-control measures. It’s a stunning dichotomy, just 75 years after the Holocaust, Jews have turned to government for their protection, and control of their arms, instead of seeking strength and independence from the very force that generates genocide.” ~ Source JPFO

#JPFO #2A #RKBA #Guns #Rights #Laws #Safety #Jews #Jewish

Busting The Best Handgun Caliber Myths – A Real World Study [Video]

This video uses the data from Greg Ellifritz’s 10-year stopping power study of real-world gun fights to shed the light of actual data on several common beliefs about handgun calibers including: 22 rifles are the best bug out guns, 45s have the best stopping power, 380s are too small to be effective, 410 guns are gimmicks, and more. Here is the link to the original data and study by Ellifritz: http://www.activeresponsetraining.net.

AP-NORC Poll: Even 33% of Liberals DO NOT favor stricter American gun laws

A recent poll that no gun owners in America that you or I know took, or even heard about until after the poll was concluded, conducted by the left leaning, liberal Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research makes the claim that a “majority of Americans favor stricter gun laws”.

When in actuality what is more likely is that a little over 1000 liberal gun control zealots were polled. And even 30% of them DO NOT favor stricter gun control. But lets make world headlines making it sound like America is all in with gun control. Mostly because the majority of their readers are so dense, they won’t look past the headline anyways.

Gun owners know that these same pollsters who claimed that Hillary would win in 2016 by a landslide cannot be trusted as a representative example of real Americans. Given their perceived stature in the news media industry, they like to make hair brained headlines that appear to be a majority of Americans views when in actuality it is a small number of people cherry picked from their left leaning audience.

We know they are just blowing sunshine up gun control zealots skirts and making national and world headlines with bullshit titles. Read the article in it’s entirety, then comment and share below your thoughts and whether you took this poll or not.
___

APNews.com – AP-NORC Poll: Majority of Americans favor stricter gun laws

WASHINGTON (AP) — A majority of Americans favor stricter gun laws, and most believe places of worship and schools have become less safe over the last two decades, according to a new poll conducted by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

The survey was conducted both before and after this month’s mass shooting at two mosques in New Zealand. It found that 67 percent of Americans support making US gun laws stricter, while 22 percent say they should be left as they are and 10 percent think they should be made less strict.

The New Zealand shooting on March 15 did not appear to have an impact on Americans’ support for new gun laws; support for tighter gun laws was the same in interview conduct before and after the shooting.

While a majority of Americans have consistently said they support stronger gun laws, proposals have stalled repeatedly in Congress in recent years, a marked contrast to New Zealand and some other countries, such as Australia, that have acted swiftly after a mass shooting. Less than a week after the mosque shootings, New Zealand moved to ban “military-style” semi-automatic weapons and high-capacity magazines; similarly, after a mass shooting in 1996, Australia enacted sweeping gun bans within two weeks.

The new poll suggests many Americans would support similar measures, but there’s a wide gulf between Democrats and Republicans on banning specific types of guns. Overall, 6 in 10 Americans support a ban on AR-15 rifles and similar semiautomatic weapons. Roughly 8 in 10 Democrats, but just about 4 in 10 Republicans, support that policy.

Republicans are also far less likely than Democrats to think that making it harder to buy a gun would prevent mass shootings, 36 percent to 81 percent. Overall, 58 percent of Americans think it would.

Still, some gun restrictions get wide support across party lines. Wide shares of both Democrats and Republicans support a universal background check requirement, along with allowing courts to prevent some people from buying guns if they are considered dangerous to themselves or others, even if they have not committed crimes.

In contrast to New Zealand, the United States has enacted few national restrictions in recent years. In part, that’s a reflection of gun rights being enshrined in the U.S. Constitution; in a poll by the Pew Research Center in spring of 2017, 74 percent of gun owners said the right to own guns is essential to their own sense of freedom.

That poll also found that gun owners were far more likely than those who don’t own guns to contact public officials about gun policy or donate to organizations that take a stance on the issue.

A divided Congress after last year’s midterm elections only serves to make any new national gun laws unlikely for the foreseeable future.

Overall support for stricter gun laws is unchanged since an AP-NORC poll conducted one year ago, a month after the school shooting in Parkland, Florida, that left 17 people killed. The post-Parkland poll marked an increase in support for stricter gun laws, from 61 percent in October 2017.

But the strength of that support appears to have ebbed. The percentage who say gun laws should be made much stricter, rather than just somewhat stricter, drifted down slightly after reaching a peak in the post-Parkland poll, from 45 percent then to 39 percent now.

The poll showed a wide share of Americans say safety in churches, synagogues, mosques and other places of worship has worsened over the past two decades. Sixty-one percent say religious houses have grown less safe over the last two decades. Slightly more said so after the New Zealand shooting than before, 64 percent to 57 percent.

Nearly 7 in 10 believe elementary and high schools have become less safe than they used to be. And 57 percent say the same about colleges and universities.

Charlene Bates, who works in the library at a high school in Idaho, said she believes a combination of factors has made schools less safe than in the past. Mental illness, parents who aren’t as engaged in their kids’ lives, social media and violent video games are among the reasons she cites for gun violence in schools.

“There are a lot of kids that you’re just unsure about, they’re kind of unstable,” said Bates, 46, from Pocatello, about 235 miles east of Boise. There are some students who are quiet, keep to themselves and she wonders if they’re “like a bomb waiting to go off. … I think that’s what scares me the most.”

While Idaho is one of the safest places in the United States, she sees coverage of mass shootings and violence elsewhere in the United States and around the world. Her school’s resource officer conducted some training recently and “he said it’s not if, it’s when. This is very likely to happen even in our community.”

“We aren’t isolated,” she said.

When it comes to places of entertainment, the public has mixed views. Nearly half consider concerts to be less safe than they were, and about as many say the same of bars and restaurants. Fewer — roughly a third — say sporting events have gotten less safe.

While many consider public transportation systems to be less safe, about a third of Americans say airports have gotten more safe over 20 years — likely a reflection of the stepped up security since the 9/11 terror attacks.

___

Pane reported from Boise, Idaho.

___

The AP-NORC poll of 1,063 adults was conducted Mar. 14-18 using a sample drawn from NORC’s probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for all respondents is plus or minus 4.1 percentage points.

___

Online:

AP-NORC Center: http://www.apnorc.org/